lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb3cf8f9-3606-c2d6-ad90-4388a52c320b@free.fr>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:12:07 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] tty: serial: samsung_tty: use 'unsigned int' not
 'unsigned'

[ Trim recipients list ]

On 10/12/2019 15:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> The function uart_console_write() expects an unsigned int, so use that
> variable type, not 'unsigned', which is generally frowned apon in the
> kernel now.

"frowned upon"

Wait, what?!

'unsigned' and 'unsigned int' are the same type, if I remember my C
lessons correctly.

Is this a uniformization issue?

Regards.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ