[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191211152801.GB28474@bogus>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:28:01 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] reset: reset-scmi: Match scmi device by both name
and protocol id
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 14:53 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > The scmi bus now has support to match the driver with devices not only
> > based on their protocol id but also based on their device name if one is
> > available. This was added to cater the need to support multiple devices
> > and drivers for the same protocol.
> >
> > Let us add the name "reset" to scmi_device_id table in the driver so
> > that in matches only with device with the same name and protocol id
> > SCMI_PROTOCOL_RESET.
> >
> > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/reset/reset-scmi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-scmi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-scmi.c
> > index b46df80ec6c3..8d3a858e3b19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-scmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-scmi.c
> > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int scmi_reset_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct scmi_device_id scmi_id_table[] = {
> > - { SCMI_PROTOCOL_RESET },
> > + { SCMI_PROTOCOL_RESET, "reset" },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(scmi, scmi_id_table);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> I can't speak to the correctness of this approach, but in case the rest
> of the series passes review, this patch is
>
I understand that and completely depends on the review of the patches
implementing it.
> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
>
> to be merged together with the other patches.
>
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists