linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.3 064/105] CIFS: Fix NULL-pointer dereference in smb2_push_mandatory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191211150247.321102026@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:05:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
        Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@...e.com>,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 064/105] CIFS: Fix NULL-pointer dereference in smb2_push_mandatory_locks

From: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>

commit 6f582b273ec23332074d970a7fb25bef835df71f upstream.

Currently when the client creates a cifsFileInfo structure for
a newly opened file, it allocates a list of byte-range locks
with a pointer to the new cfile and attaches this list to the
inode's lock list. The latter happens before initializing all
other fields, e.g. cfile->tlink. Thus a partially initialized
cifsFileInfo structure becomes available to other threads that
walk through the inode's lock list. One example of such a thread
may be an oplock break worker thread that tries to push all
cached byte-range locks. This causes NULL-pointer dereference
in smb2_push_mandatory_locks() when accessing cfile->tlink:

[598428.945633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000038
...
[598428.945749] Workqueue: cifsoplockd cifs_oplock_break [cifs]
[598428.945793] RIP: 0010:smb2_push_mandatory_locks+0xd6/0x5a0 [cifs]
...
[598428.945834] Call Trace:
[598428.945870]  ? cifs_revalidate_mapping+0x45/0x90 [cifs]
[598428.945901]  cifs_oplock_break+0x13d/0x450 [cifs]
[598428.945909]  process_one_work+0x1db/0x380
[598428.945914]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x400
[598428.945921]  kthread+0x104/0x140
[598428.945925]  ? process_one_work+0x380/0x380
[598428.945931]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[598428.945937]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

Fix this by reordering initialization steps of the cifsFileInfo
structure: initialize all the fields first and then add the new
byte-range lock list to the inode's lock list.

Cc: Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/cifs/file.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -313,9 +313,6 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
 	fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
 	cfile->llist = fdlocks;
-	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
-	list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
-	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 
 	cfile->count = 1;
 	cfile->pid = current->tgid;
@@ -339,6 +336,10 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
 		oplock = 0;
 	}
 
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
+	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+
 	spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
 	if (fid->pending_open->oplock != CIFS_OPLOCK_NO_CHANGE && oplock)
 		oplock = fid->pending_open->oplock;