[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB702329852A1DEF9B87414E5DEE5A0@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:02:01 +0000
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...auone-net.jp>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Explicitly restore
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
On 10.12.2019 22:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> This is currently off and that's not desirable: default imx config is
>> meant to be generally useful for development and debugging.
>>
>> Running git bisect between v5.4 and v5.5-rc1 finds this started from
>> commit 0e4a459f56c3 ("tracing: Remove unnecessary DEBUG_FS dependency")
>>
>> Explicit CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y was earlier removed by
>> commit c29d541f590c ("ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Remove unneeded options")
>>
>> A very similar fix was required before:
>> commit 7e9eb6268809 ("ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Explicitly restore CONFIG_DEBUG_FS")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> Any suggestions to prevent such unexpected kconfig changes in the
>> future? It might make sense for DEBUG_FS to be "default y".
>
> What? No, no system functionality should _EVER_ be dependant on debugfs
> being enabled at all.
>
> If your kernel code requires this, then you are doing something really
> really really wrong.
>
> Now if you just want to have a nice debugging system, then sure, enable
> the option, but it is not anything that should ever be required by any
> working system.
I just want a nice debugging system, my concern is that kconfig rule
adjustments sometimes unexpectedly break this. This issues apparently
also affected shmobile: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11278961/
Config options which can be manually controlled but are also "selected"
from a whole bunch of places can get lost after savedefconfig
Would it be reasonable to make all users "depend on" rather than
"select" DEBUG_FS?
Or perhaps DEBUG_FS could be "default y if DEBUG_KERNEL"?
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists