linux-kernel - Re: ftrace histogram sorting broken on BE architecures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1576092363.2833.20.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:26:03 -0600
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace histogram sorting broken on BE architecures

Hi Steve,

On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 12:00 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:37:18 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Tom,
> > > 
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, from what I can tell, all sums and keys
> > > are
> > > u64 unless they are a string. Thus, I believe this patch should
> > > not
> > > have any issues.  
> > 
> > The sums are u64, but the keys may not be.  I'll take a look and
> > see,
> 
> Are they? I see in create_key_field:
> 
> 	key_size = ALIGN(key_size, sizeof(u64));
> 
> Which to me seems that we'll have nothing smaller than sizeof(u64).
> 

Yeah, that makes them effectively u64 in this case, so I'd agree.

Tom