[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191211203802.GB862919@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:38:02 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of
metric group with multiple events
> > But while looking at the patch, I found that, commit f01642e4912b
> > has (again) screwed up logic for metric with overlapping events.
>
> Is someone looking into this?
Looks like we really need some proper regression tests for this.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists