[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191211230126.GC862919@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:01:26 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Add support for used defined metric
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:47:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> Joe asked for possibility to add user defined metrics. Given that
> we already have metrics support, I added --metric option that allows
> to specify metric on the command line, like:
>
> # perf stat --metric 'DECODED_ICACHE_UOPS% = 100 * (idq.dsb_uops / \
> (idq.ms_uops + idq.mite_uops + idq.dsb_uops + lsd.uops))' ...
>
> The code facilitates the current metric code, and I was surprised
> how easy it was, so I'm not sure I omitted something ;-)
There are some asserts you can hit, like for too many events.
Also some of the syntax (e.g. using @ instead of / and escapes) are
not super user friendly.
Other than that it should be ok.
Of course it would be better to put it into a file,
and then support comments etc.
I've been considering some extensions to perf to support @file
reading with comment support.
Right now there are some very odd bugs when you do that, lie
-e 'event,<newline>
event,<newline>
event...'
adds the newline to the event name, which breaks the output formats.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists