[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR07MB6514A9B0EBD033A91000F2FED35A0@BY5PR07MB6514.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:20:37 +0000
From: Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"nicolas.nerre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.nerre@...rochip.com>,
"antoine.tenart@...tlin.com" <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhananjay Vilasrao Kangude <dkangude@...ence.com>,
"a.fatoum@...gutronix.de" <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
"brad.mouring@...com" <brad.mouring@...com>,
Parshuram Raju Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] net: macb: add support for high speed interface
>> >How has this been tested?
>> >
>>
>> This patch is tested in 10G fixed mode on SFP+ module.
>>
>> In our own lab, we have various hardware test platforms supporting SGMII
>(through a TI PHY and another build that connects to a Marvell 1G PHY), GMII
>(through a Marvell PHY), 10GBASE-R (direct connection to SFP+), USXGMII
>(currently we can emulate this using an SFP+ connection from/to our own
>hardware)
>
>Are any of these PHY using C45?
No, none of these PHYs use C45.
For C45 testing we had a simulated PHY. The simulated PHY implemented a Clause 45 slave interface.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists