linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] xenbus/backend: Add memory pressure handler callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:20:11 +0100
From:   SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc:     jgross@...e.com, axboe@...nel.dk, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        "SeongJae Park" <sjpark@...zon.de>, pdurrant@...zon.com,
        sjpark@...zon.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] xenbus/backend: Add memory pressure handler callback

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:46:51 +0100 "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@...rix.com> wrote:

> > Granting pages consumes backend system memory.  In systems configured
> > with insufficient spare memory for those pages, it can cause a memory
> > pressure situation.  However, finding the optimal amount of the spare
>                                                               ^ s/the//
> > memory is challenging for large systems having dynamic resource
> > utilization patterns.  Also, such a static configuration might lack
> > flexibility.
> > 
> > To mitigate such problems, this commit adds a memory reclaim callback to
> > 'xenbus_driver'.  If a memory pressure is detected, 'xenbus' requests
>                        ^ s/a//
> > every backend driver to volunarily release its memory.
> > 
> > Note that it would be able to improve the callback facility for more
>                         ^ possible
> > sophisticated handlings of general pressures.  For example, it would be
>                 ^ handling of resource starvation.
> > possible to monitor the memory consumption of each device and issue the
> > release requests to only devices which causing the pressure.  Also, the
> > callback could be extended to handle not only memory, but general
> > resources.  Nevertheless, this version of the implementation defers such
> > sophisticated goals as a future work.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/xen/xenbus.h                      |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> > index b0bed4faf44c..aedbe2198de5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> > @@ -248,6 +248,35 @@ static int backend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> >  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int xenbus_backend_reclaim(struct device *dev, void *data)
> 
> No need for the xenbus_ prefix since it's a static function, ie:
> backend_reclaim_memory should be fine IMO.

Agreed, will change the name in the next version.

> 
> > +{
> > +	struct xenbus_driver *drv;
> 
> I've asked for this variable to be constified in v5, is it not
> possible to make it const?

Sorry, my mistake...  I was difinitely too hurry.

> 
> > +
> > +	if (!dev->driver)
> > +		return 0;
> > +	drv = to_xenbus_driver(dev->driver);
> > +	if (drv && drv->reclaim)
> > +		drv->reclaim(to_xenbus_device(dev));
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Returns 0 always because we are using shrinker to only detect memory
> > + * pressure.
> > + */
> > +static unsigned long xenbus_backend_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> > +				struct shrink_control *sc)
> > +{
> > +	bus_for_each_dev(&xenbus_backend.bus, NULL, NULL,
> > +			xenbus_backend_reclaim);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct shrinker xenbus_backend_shrinker = {
> 
> I would drop the xenbus prefix, and I think it's not possible to
> constify this due to register_shrinker expecting a non-const
> parameter?

Yes, constifying it results in another compile warning.  Will drop the prefix.

> 
> > +	.count_objects = xenbus_backend_shrink_count,
> > +	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int __init xenbus_probe_backend_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	static struct notifier_block xenstore_notifier = {
> > @@ -264,6 +293,9 @@ static int __init xenbus_probe_backend_init(void)
> >  
> >  	register_xenstore_notifier(&xenstore_notifier);
> >  
> > +	if (register_shrinker(&xenbus_backend_shrinker))
> > +		pr_warn("shrinker registration failed\n");
> 
> Can you add a xenbus prefix to the error message? Or else it's hard to
> know which subsystem is complaining when you see such message on the
> log. ie: "xenbus: shrinker ..."

Because we have #define `pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt` in the beginning
of the file, the message will have a proper prefix.

> 
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  subsys_initcall(xenbus_probe_backend_init);
> > diff --git a/include/xen/xenbus.h b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > index 869c816d5f8c..196260017666 100644
> > --- a/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > +++ b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct xenbus_driver {
> >  	struct device_driver driver;
> >  	int (*read_otherend_details)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> >  	int (*is_ready)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> > +	void (*reclaim)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> 
> reclaim_memory (if Juergen agrees).

Okay.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

> 
> Thanks, Roger.
>