linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/17] asm-generic/tlb: Rename HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191211122956.055418242@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:07:20 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/17] asm-generic/tlb: Rename HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER

Towards a more consistent naming scheme.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/Kconfig              |    2 +-
 arch/s390/Kconfig         |    2 +-
 include/asm-generic/tlb.h |   14 ++++++++++++--
 mm/mmu_gather.c           |   10 +++++-----
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ config MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE
 config MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE
 	bool
 
-config HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+config MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	bool
 
 config ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ config S390
 	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
 	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
 	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
-	select HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+	select MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
 	select HAVE_NOP_MCOUNT
 	select HAVE_OPROFILE
--- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
@@ -147,6 +147,16 @@
  *  MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE
  *
  *  Use this if your architecture lacks an efficient flush_tlb_range().
+ *
+ *  MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+ *
+ *  If the option is set the mmu_gather will not track individual pages for
+ *  delayed page free anymore. A platform that enables the option needs to
+ *  provide its own implementation of the __tlb_remove_page_size() function to
+ *  free pages.
+ *
+ *  This is useful if your architecture already flushes TLB entries in the
+ *  various ptep_get_and_clear() functions.
  */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
@@ -191,7 +201,7 @@ extern void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_
 
 #endif
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 /*
  * If we can't allocate a page to make a big batch of page pointers
  * to work on, then just handle a few from the on-stack structure.
@@ -266,7 +276,7 @@ struct mmu_gather {
 
 	unsigned int		batch_count;
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	struct mmu_gather_batch *active;
 	struct mmu_gather_batch	local;
 	struct page		*__pages[MMU_GATHER_BUNDLE];
--- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 
 static bool tlb_next_batch(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
 {
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool __tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_g
 	return false;
 }
 
-#endif /* HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER */
+#endif /* MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static void tlb_flush_mmu_free(struct mm
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 	tlb_table_flush(tlb);
 #endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	tlb_batch_pages_flush(tlb);
 #endif
 }
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *t
 	/* Is it from 0 to ~0? */
 	tlb->fullmm     = !(start | (end+1));
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	tlb->need_flush_all = 0;
 	tlb->local.next = NULL;
 	tlb->local.nr   = 0;
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ void tlb_finish_mmu(struct mmu_gather *t
 
 	tlb_flush_mmu(tlb);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	tlb_batch_list_free(tlb);
 #endif
 	dec_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);