linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191211130857.GB23383@linux.fritz.box>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:08:57 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or
 ksyms

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:55PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
[...]
> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
> this?), or should I resend?

Fixes tags should /always/ be present if possible, since they help to provide
more context even if the buggy commit was in bpf-next, for example.