linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] fs: introduce is_dot_or

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191211144055.GA6951@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:41:00 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@....com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: introduce is_dot_or_dotdot helper for cleanup

Hi Matthew,

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 05:40:14AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:17:11PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > static inline bool is_dot_or_dotdot(const unsigned char *name, size_t len)
> > > {
> > >         if (len >= 1 && unlikely(name[0] == '.')) {
> > 
> > 
> > And I suggest drop "unlikely" here since files start with prefix
> > '.' (plus specical ".", "..") are not as uncommon as you expected...
> 
> They absolutely are uncommon.  Even if you just consider
> /home/willy/kernel/linux/.git/config, only one of those six path elements
> starts with a '.'.

Okay, I think it depends on userdata and access patterns.
I admit I have no statistics on all those callers.

Just considering introducing an inline helper for cleanup, except for
lookup_one_len_common() (since it's on an error path), others were all
without unlikely() before.

Ignore my words if it seems unreasonable or unlikely() is an improvement
in this patch and sorry for annoying.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang