[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dec45157-5358-62ee-c22c-ba11b13bc407@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:50:05 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix 'perf top' breakage on architectures not providing
get_cpuid() Re: perf top for arm64?
>
>> Right, I need to make that just a pr_debug() message and then check in
>> the annotation code when that is needed to see if it is set, if not,
>> then show a popup error message and refuse to do whatever annotation
>> feature requires that.
>
>> Anyway, your patch should make sense and provide info that the ARM64
>> annotation may use now or in the future.
>
> So can you take a look at the two patches below and provide me Acked-by
> and/or Reviewed-by and/or Tested-by?
>
>
>>>From 53c6cde6a71a1a9283763bd2e938b229b50c2cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:09:24 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf arch: Make the default get_cpuid() return compatible
> error
>
> Some of the functions calling get_cpuid() propagate back the error it
> returns, and all are using errno (positive) values, make the weak
> default get_cpuid() function return ENOSYS to be consistent and to allow
> checking if this is an arch not providing this function or if a provided
> one is having trouble getting the cpuid, to decide if the warning should
> be provided to the user or just a debug message should be emitted.
>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
For both patches:
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> #arm64
I'll still look to get the arm64 version of get_cpuid() patch sent.
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lxwjr0cd2eggzx04a780ffrv@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index becc2d109423..4d39a75551a0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ int __weak strcmp_cpuid_str(const char *mapcpuid, const char *cpuid)
> */
> int __weak get_cpuid(char *buffer __maybe_unused, size_t sz __maybe_unused)
> {
> - return -1;
> + return ENOSYS; /* Not implemented */
> }
>
> static int write_cpuid(struct feat_fd *ff,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists