[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:39:38 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: exynos4-is: add missed clk_disable_unprepare in
remove
On 11/4/19 4:49 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> This driver forgets to disable and unprepare clock when remove.
> Add a call to clk_disable_unprepare to fix it.
I'd like an Ack from Samsung before I apply this. I see this in the probe() in fimc-lite.c:
if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fimc->clock);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_sd;
}
So is it right to always call clk_disable_unprepare in the remove()?
I suspect it is correct, but I would like someone else to take a look as well.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> index e87c6a09205b..6748bd96aada 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> @@ -1614,6 +1614,7 @@ static int fimc_lite_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct fimc_lite *fimc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> + clk_disable_unprepare(fimc->clock);
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> fimc_lite_unregister_capture_subdev(fimc);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists