[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 23:04:32 +0800
From: Landen Chao <landen.chao@...iatek.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com"
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>,
"opensource@...rst.com" <opensource@...rst.com>,
"frank-w@...lic-files.de" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: dsa: mt7530: Add the support of
MT7531 switch
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 03:27 +0800, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Do you also hint at using the same number of parameters for
> > mt7531_ind_c22_phy_read() and mt7531_ind_c45_phy_read()?
>
> That is up to you. It just seems like your MDIO bus can do both C22
> and C45. And somebody might connect an external C45 PHY, so you might
> as well support it.
Yes, it is better to support external C45 PHY. Thanks for your advice.
Landen
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists