[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:15:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/core: Preempt current task in favour of bound
kthread
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2019-12-12 11:10:31]:
>
> >
> > +static struct sched_entity *
> > +__pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr);
>
> I think we already have __pick_next_entity in kernel/sched/fair.c
D'oh... yeah, I just wrote stuff, it never actually got near a compiler.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists