lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:01:42 +0200
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <nm@...com>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>
CC:     <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lokeshvutla@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
        <j-keerthy@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] dmaengine/soc: Add Texas Instruments UDMA
 support



On 09/12/2019 11:43, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Vinod, Nishanth, Tero, Santosh: the ti_sci patch in this series was sent
> upstream over a month ago:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191025084715.25098-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/
> 
> I'm still waiting on it's fate (Tero has given his r-b).
> The ti_sci patch did not made it to 5.5-rc1, but I included it in the series and
> let the maintainers decide if it can go via DMAengine for 5.6 or to later
> releases (5.6 probably for the ti_sci and 5.7 for the UDMA driver patch).
> 
> Changes since v6:
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/list/?series=209455&state=*)
> 
> - UDMAP DMAengine driver:
>   - Squashed the split patches
>   - Squashed the early TX completion handling update
>     (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/list/?series=210713&state=*)
>   - Hard reset fix for RX channels to avoid channel lockdown
>   - Correct completed descriptor's residue value
> 

Thank you Peter,
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ