[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1576202134.4579.189.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:55:34 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.snowberg@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthewgarrett@...gle.com,
sashal@...nel.org, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot "key"
measurements
> +/*
> + * ima_process_queued_keys() - process keys queued for measurement
> + *
> + * This function sets ima_process_keys to true and processes queued keys.
> + * From here on keys will be processed right away (not queued).
> + */
> +void ima_process_queued_keys(void)
> +{
> + struct ima_key_entry *entry, *tmp;
> + LIST_HEAD(temp_ima_keys);
> +
> + if (ima_process_keys)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * To avoid holding the mutex when processing queued keys,
> + * transfer the queued keys with the mutex held to a temp list,
> + * release the mutex, and then process the queued keys from
> + * the temp list.
> + *
> + * Since ima_process_keys is set to true, any new key will be
> + * processed immediately and not be queued.
> + */
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&temp_ima_keys);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ima_keys_mutex);
Don't you need a test here, before setting ima_process_keys?
if (ima_process_keys)
return;
Mimi
> +
> + ima_process_keys = true;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ima_keys, list)
> + list_move_tail(&entry->list, &temp_ima_keys);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ima_keys_mutex);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &temp_ima_keys, list) {
> + process_buffer_measurement(entry->payload, entry->payload_len,
> + entry->keyring_name, KEY_CHECK, 0,
> + entry->keyring_name);
> + list_del(&entry->list);
> + ima_free_key_entry(entry);
> + }
> +}
> +
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists