[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7a5b896-4222-5e2e-5479-37c65e5e6b03@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:03:47 +0800
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
<mgorman@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: fix trival print task format
Hi,
On 2019/12/12 22:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:22:44 +0800
> Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Ensure levave a whitespace between state and task name.
>
> "levave"?
Sorry for the typo.
>
>>
>> w/o patch:
>> runnable tasks:
>> S task PID tree-key switches prio wait
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> I kworker/0:2 656 87693.884557 8255 120
>> Sirq/10-ACPI:Ged 829 0.000000 3 49
>> Sirq/11-ACPI:Ged 830 0.000000 3 49
>> Sirq/50-arm-smmu 945 0.000000 3 49
>>
>> with patch:
>> runnable tasks:
>> S task PID tree-key switches prio wait
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I kworker/0:2 656 87693.884557 8255 120
>> S irq/10-ACPI:Ged 829 0.000000 3 49
>> S irq/11-ACPI:Ged 830 0.000000 3 49
>> S irq/50-arm-smmu 945 0.000000 3 49
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/debug.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> index f7e4579e746c..a1b5a4c1213e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> @@ -434,9 +434,9 @@ static void
>> print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>> {
>> if (rq->curr == p)
>> - SEQ_printf(m, ">R");
>> + SEQ_printf(m, ">R ");
>> else
>> - SEQ_printf(m, " %c", task_state_to_char(p));
>> + SEQ_printf(m, " %c ", task_state_to_char(p));
>>
>> SEQ_printf(m, "%15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to just add one space to the above?
>
> SEQ_printf(m, " %15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
>
> ?
That true, thanks.
>
> -- Steve
>
>> p->comm, task_pid_nr(p),
>> @@ -465,10 +465,10 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
>>
>> SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
>> SEQ_printf(m, "runnable tasks:\n");
>> - SEQ_printf(m, " S task PID tree-key switches prio"
>> + SEQ_printf(m, " S task PID tree-key switches prio"
>> " wait-time sum-exec sum-sleep\n");
>> SEQ_printf(m, "-------------------------------------------------------"
>> - "----------------------------------------------------\n");
>> + "------------------------------------------------------\n");
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists