[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191213114231.GC4644@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:42:31 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/25] spi: gpio: Implement LSB First bitbang support
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:08:24PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 12.12.19 um 18:19 schrieb Mark Brown:
> >>>> Duplicate the inline helpers bitbang_txrx_be_cpha{0,1} as LE versions.
> >>>> Make checkpatch.pl happy by changing "unsigned" to "unsigned int".
> > Separate patch for this?
> For the checkpatch cleanup? Or helpers preparation vs. spi-gpio.c usage?
At least the checkpatch cleanup.
> > Yeah, I don't think there's any great options here with the potential
> > performance issues - probably the nicest thing would be to autogenerate
> > lots of variants but I think that's far more trouble than it's worth.
> Maybe add another code comment to revisit that idea later then?
Sure, if you like.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists