[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c2b16c0-3e66-d809-b263-f27cf925e203@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:04:20 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] i2c: tegra: Fix suspending in active runtime PM
state
13.12.2019 16:47, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:34:28AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> I noticed that sometime I2C clock is kept enabled during suspend-resume.
>> This happens because runtime PM defers dynamic suspension and thus it may
>> happen that runtime PM is in active state when system enters into suspend.
>> In particular I2C controller that is used for CPU's DVFS is often kept ON
>> during suspend because CPU's voltage scaling happens quite often.
>>
>> Note: we marked runtime PM as IRQ-safe during the driver's probe in the
>> "Support atomic transfers" patch, thus it's okay to enforce runtime PM
>> suspend/resume in the NOIRQ phase which is used for the system-level
>> suspend/resume of the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> I've recently discussed this with Rafael in the context of runtime PM
> support in the Tegra DRM driver and my understanding is that you're not
> supposed to force runtime PM suspension like this.
>
> I had meant to send out an alternative patch to fix this, which I've
> done now:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1209148/
>
> That's more in line with what Rafael and I had discussed in the other
> thread and should address the issue that you're seeing as well.
Well, either me or you are still having some misunderstanding of the
runtime PM :) To my knowledge there are a lot of drivers that enforce
suspension of the runtime PM during system's suspend, it should be a
right thing to do especially in a context of the Tegra I2C driver
because we're using asynchronous pm_runtime_put() and thus at the time
of system's suspending, the runtime PM could be ON (as I wrote in the
commit message) and then Terga's I2C driver manually disables the clock
on resume (woopsie).
By invoking pm_runtime_force_suspend() on systems's suspend, the runtime
PM executes tegra_i2c_runtime_suspend() if device is in active state. On
system resume, pm_runtime_force_resume() either keeps device in a
suspended state or resumes it, say if for userspace disabled the runtime
PM for the I2C controller.
Rafael, could you please clarify whether my patch is doing a wrong thing?
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> index b3ecdd87e91f..d309a314f4d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> @@ -1790,9 +1790,14 @@ static int tegra_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> static int __maybe_unused tegra_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int err;
>>
>> i2c_mark_adapter_suspended(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>>
>> + err = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1813,6 +1818,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused tegra_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>>
>> + err = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>>
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 2.24.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists