lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaQZZcaPtDfieGSP9wSow11Xv3K_x89bq=QeYGb2BhpHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:59:50 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Fix missing OF and GPIOLIB dependency
 on S3C24xx and S3C64xx

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:24 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:

> All Samsung pinctrl drivers select common part - PINCTRL_SAMSUNG which uses
> both OF and GPIOLIB inside.  However only Exynos drivers depend on these,
> therefore after enabling COMPILE_TEST, on x86_64 build of S3C64xx driver
> failed:
>
>     drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c: In function ‘samsung_gpiolib_register’:
>     drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c:969:5: error: ‘struct gpio_chip’ has no member named ‘of_node’
>        gc->of_node = bank->of_node;
>          ^
>
> Rework the dependencies so all Samsung drivers and common
> PINCTRL_SAMSUNG part depend on OF_GPIO (which is default yes if GPIOLIB
> and OF are enabled).
>
> Reported-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>

What should this be applied on? It doesn't apply to my fixes
branch which is close to v5.5-rc1. Please rebase and resend
if this was not based on that.

Should this have a Fixes: tag?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ