[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21ca72b0-c35d-96b7-399f-d4034d976c27@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:22:46 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: don't wait when under-submitting
On 12/13/19 12:51 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> There is no reliable way to submit and wait in a single syscall, as
> io_submit_sqes() may under-consume sqes (in case of an early error).
> Then it will wait for not-yet-submitted requests, deadlocking the user
> in most cases.
Why not just cap the wait_nr? If someone does to_submit = 8, wait_nr = 8,
and we only submit 4, just wait for 4? Ala:
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 81219a631a6d..4a76ccbb7856 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5272,6 +5272,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
submitted = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit, f.file, fd,
&cur_mm, false);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (submitted <= 0)
+ goto done;
+ if (submitted != to_submit && min_complete > submitted)
+ min_complete = submitted;
}
if (flags & IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS) {
unsigned nr_events = 0;
@@ -5284,7 +5288,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
ret = io_cqring_wait(ctx, min_complete, sig, sigsz);
}
}
-
+done:
percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
out_fput:
fdput(f);
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists