[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8944148-1f66-f367-04d8-93d30997d123@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:40:48 +0000
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/11] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing
for htab and htab_percpu map
On 12/11/19 2:33 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>
> Tested bpf_map_lookup_batch(), bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(),
> bpf_map_update_batch(), and bpf_map_delete_batch() functionality.
> $ ./test_maps
> ...
> test_htab_map_batch_ops:PASS
> test_htab_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 269 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..dabc4d420a10e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> +
> +#include <bpf_util.h>
> +#include <test_maps.h>
> +
> +static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys,
> + void *values, bool is_pcpu)
> +{
> + typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value);
> + int i, j, err;
> + value *v;
We can initialize the above 'v' to 'v = NULL'.
Some compiler may not be smart enough to find out 'v' is always initialized.
> +
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + v = (value *)values;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
> + keys[i] = i + 1;
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++)
> + bpf_percpu(v[i], j) = i + 2 + j;
> + else
> + ((int *)values)[i] = i + 2;
> + }
> +
> + err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, 0, 0);
> + CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno));
> +}
> +
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists