[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157603276975.18462.4638422874481955289@pipeline>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:52:49 -0800
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...ux.intel.com>
To: "alexandru.ardelean@...log.com" <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
"allison@...utok.net" <allison@...utok.net>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"ayal@...lanox.com" <ayal@...lanox.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"hauke.mehrtens@...el.com" <hauke.mehrtens@...el.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
"saeedm@...lanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Cc: "vinicius.gomes@...el.com" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Subject: Re: [v1,net-next, 1/2] ethtool: add setting frame preemption of traffic classes
Hi Po,
Quoting Po Liu (2019-11-27 01:59:18)
> IEEE Std 802.1Qbu standard defined the frame preemption of port
> traffic classes. This patch introduce a method to set traffic
> classes preemption. Add a parameter 'preemption' in struct
> ethtool_link_settings. The value will be translated to a binary,
> each bit represent a traffic class. Bit "1" means preemptable
> traffic class. Bit "0" means express traffic class. MSB represent
> high number traffic class.
>
> If hardware support the frame preemption, driver could set the
> ethernet device with hw_features and features with NETIF_F_PREEMPTION
> when initializing the port driver.
>
> User can check the feature 'tx-preemption' by command 'ethtool -k
> devname'. If hareware set preemption feature. The property would
> be a fixed value 'on' if hardware support the frame preemption.
> Feature would show a fixed value 'off' if hardware don't support
> the frame preemption.
>
> Command 'ethtool devname' and 'ethtool -s devname preemption N'
> would show/set which traffic classes are frame preemptable.
>
> Port driver would implement the frame preemption in the function
> get_link_ksettings() and set_link_ksettings() in the struct ethtool_ops.
In an early RFC series [1], we proposed a way to support frame preemption. I'm not
sure if you have considered it before implementing this other proposal based on
ethtool interface so I thought it would be a good idea to bring that up to your
attention, just in case.
In that initial proposal, Frame Preemption feature is configured via taprio
qdisc. For example:
$ tc qdisc add dev IFACE parent root handle 100 taprio \
num_tc 3 \
map 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
queues 1@0 1@1 2@2 \
preemption 0 1 1 1 \
base-time 10000000 \
sched-entry S 01 300000 \
sched-entry S 02 300000 \
sched-entry S 04 400000 \
clockid CLOCK_TAI
It also aligns with the gate control operations Set-And-Hold-MAC and
Set-And-Release-MAC that can be set via 'sched-entry' (see Table 8.7 from
802.1Q-2018 for further details.
Please share your thoughts on this.
Regards,
Andre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists