linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: tpm: Add YAML schema for TPM TIS I2C options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191213223623.GA14809@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:36:23 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     amirmizi6@...il.com
Cc:     Eyal.Cohen@...oton.com, jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com,
        oshrialkoby85@...il.com, alexander.steffen@...ineon.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
        arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@...oton.com,
        tmaimon77@...il.com, gcwilson@...ibm.com, kgoldman@...ibm.com,
        ayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Dan.Morav@...oton.com,
        oren.tanami@...oton.com, shmulik.hager@...oton.com,
        amir.mizinski@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: tpm: Add YAML schema for TPM TIS I2C
 options

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:33:31PM +0200, amirmizi6@...il.com wrote:
> From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> 
> Added a YAML schema to support tpm tis i2c realted dt-bindings for the I2c PTP based physical layer.

Wrap your commmit message. And TPM, TIS?, and I2C should be capitalized.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml

Please read my comments on v1 (The first v1 from 11/10, not the 2nd v1 
you sent).

Rob