[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191213154448.2.Id445d0057bedcb0a190009e0706e9254c2fd48eb@changeid>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:45:23 -0800
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: robdclark@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
seanpaul@...omium.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: zero is never greater than an unsigned int
When we iterate over ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut, there's no reason to
start at index 0 which always contains the value 0. 0 is not a valid
link rate.
This change should have no real effect but is a small cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 2fb9370a76e6..7b596af265e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dp_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
/* set DP data rate */
dp_rate_mhz = ((bit_rate_mhz / pdata->dsi->lanes) * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM) /
DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
+ for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz)
break;
--
2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists