[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b167e207-f919-be9a-08cb-1d1a56e25e37@web.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 19:10:55 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/gup: Fix memory leak in __gup_benchmark_ioctl
…
> +++ b/mm/gup_benchmark.c
…
> @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ static int __gup_benchmark_ioctl(unsigned int cmd,
> end_time = ktime_get();
> gup->put_delta_usec = ktime_us_delta(end_time, start_time);
>
> +done:
> kvfree(pages);
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static long gup_benchmark_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd,
Can the addition of a label like “free_pages” be more appropriate here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists