linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191214033516.GA6676@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 19:35:16 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: X86_FEATURE bit() cleanup

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:58:20AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Small series to add build-time protections on reverse CPUID lookup (and
> other usages of bit()), and to rename the misleading-generic bit() helper
> to something that better conveys its purpose.

Paolo, please don't merge this even though Jim's feedback was minor, I
have a revamped version that I'll send out next week.  Thanks!