linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (objtool, lots in btrfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe1e0318-9b74-7ae0-07bd-d7a6c908e79a@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 23:05:18 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     dsterba@...e.cz, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (objtool, lots in btrfs)

On 12/13/19 9:45 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 04:04:58PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>> index b2e8fd8a8e59..bbd68520f5f1 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>> @@ -3110,14 +3110,16 @@ do {								\
>>>  	rcu_read_unlock();					\
>>>  } while (0)
>>>  
>>> -__cold
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
>>> +__cold __unlikely
>>
>> what provides __unlikely?  It is causing build errors.
>>
>> and if I remove the "__unlikely", I still see the objtool warnings
>> (unreachable instructions).
> 
> Ha, not sure how that happened... Should be __noreturn instead of
> __unlikely.  Cheers...
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index b2e8fd8a8e59..398bd010dfc5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -3110,14 +3110,16 @@ do {								\
>  	rcu_read_unlock();					\
>  } while (0)
>  
> -__cold
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
> +__cold __noreturn
>  static inline void assfail(const char *expr, const char *file, int line)
>  {
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT)) {
> -		pr_err("assertion failed: %s, in %s:%d\n", expr, file, line);
> -		BUG();
> -	}
> +	pr_err("assertion failed: %s, in %s:%d\n", expr, file, line);
> +	BUG();
>  }
> +#else
> +static inline void assfail(const char *expr, const char *file, int line) {}
> +#endif
>  
>  #define ASSERT(expr)	\
>  	(likely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__))
> 

OK, that fixes most of them, but still leaves these 2:

btrfs006.out:fs/btrfs/extent_io.o: warning: objtool: __set_extent_bit()+0x536: unreachable instruction
btrfs006.out:fs/btrfs/relocation.o: warning: objtool: add_tree_block()+0x501: unreachable instruction

Those .o files are attached.

-- 
~Randy


Download attachment "relocation.o.gz" of type "application/gzip" (85637 bytes)

Download attachment "extent_io.o.gz" of type "application/gzip" (101291 bytes)