linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: drop #clock-cells from rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191216175615.GA23392@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:56:15 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     kishon@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: drop #clock-cells from
 rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:24:47 +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
> 
> Further review of the dsi components for the px30 revealed that the
> phy shouldn't expose the pll as clock but instead handle settings
> via phy parameters.
> 
> As the phy binding is new and not used anywhere yet, just drop them
> so they don't get used.
> 
> Fixes: 3817c7961179 ("dt-bindings: phy: add yaml binding for rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy")
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
> ---
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> maybe suitable as a fix for 5.5-rc?
> 
> Thanks
> Heiko
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy.yaml      | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.