[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47757327-f6df-9146-03a1-2b32b23a37e6@web.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:43:43 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Chas Williams <3chas3@...il.com>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fore200e: Fix incorrect checks of NULL pointer
dereference
> The patch fixes these issues by avoiding NULL pointer dereferences.
I suggest to choose a better wording for this change description.
Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful here?
…
> +++ b/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
…
> @@ -1480,9 +1482,18 @@ fore200e_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
…
> + fore200e = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
> + fore200e_vcc = FORE200E_VCC(vcc);
> +
> + if (!fore200e)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + txq = &fore200e->host_txq;
> + if (!fore200e_vcc)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!test_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &vcc->flags)) {
…
Can the following adjustment be nicer?
+ fore200e_vcc = FORE200E_VCC(vcc);
+ if (!fore200e_vcc)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ fore200e = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
+ if (!fore200e)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ txq = &fore200e->host_txq;
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists