linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: pca953x: Add Maxim MAX7313 PWM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:24:21 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: pca953x: Add Maxim MAX7313 PWM support

Hi Miquèl

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:14:16AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote on Mon, 16 Dec
> 2019 09:54:24 +0100:
> > intensity = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((unsigned long long)state->duty_cycle * PWM_DC_STATES, state->period);
> > 
> > should be both more exact and cheaper to calculate. (But this is
> > somewhat moot given that state->period shouldn't be there.)
> > (And in general you have to care for overflowing, but I think that's not
> > a problem in practise here as struct pwm_state::duty_cycle is an int
> > (still), and PWM_DC_STATES is small.)
> 
> Do you plan to change duty_cycle type?

I don't, but https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1195481/

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |