[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191216092421.qjifzrdggu7jgqj3@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:24:21 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: pca953x: Add Maxim MAX7313 PWM support
Hi Miquèl
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:14:16AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote on Mon, 16 Dec
> 2019 09:54:24 +0100:
> > intensity = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((unsigned long long)state->duty_cycle * PWM_DC_STATES, state->period);
> >
> > should be both more exact and cheaper to calculate. (But this is
> > somewhat moot given that state->period shouldn't be there.)
> > (And in general you have to care for overflowing, but I think that's not
> > a problem in practise here as struct pwm_state::duty_cycle is an int
> > (still), and PWM_DC_STATES is small.)
>
> Do you plan to change duty_cycle type?
I don't, but https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1195481/
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists