lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f37cbcc-7f2e-2cfd-8b4f-74fefc767074@EyeKnowHow.de>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:17:05 +0100
From:   Hermann Ruckerbauer <Hermann.Ruckerbauer@...KnowHow.de>
To:     tony.luck@...el.com
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Denverton decoding: BIOS performance setting

Hello,

not sure if this is a bit off topic, but I hope to get some answers ...

I looked to the Apollo lake pnd2_edac.c  code, my understandig is, that
this is the same as for denverton.
but in our BIOS is see one point in the memory settings called
"Performance profile"
Selectable is "17_9_13_18", "17_19_6_18" or "17_19_6_7"
This setting seems to be realated to the DMAP table... but for APL there
are just the "standard" configs visible.

Does anybody know if these DMAP settings are different in Denverton vs.
Apollo lake, and how these are decoded in the PND2_edac.c cource code ?
at least I have not found any hint on this performance setting in the
code..

Thanks a lot

-- 

EKH - EyeKnowHow 
Signal Quality - Made in Bavaria
Hermann Ruckerbauer
www.EyeKnowHow.de
Hermann.Ruckerbauer@...KnowHow.de
Itzlinger Strasse 21a
94469 Deggendorf
Tel.:	+49 (0)991 / 29 69 29 05
Mobile:	+49 (0)176  / 787 787 77
Fax:	+49 (0)3212 / 121 9008

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ