linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: simple: Support reset GPIOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191216141036.24c22899@xps13>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:10:36 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: simple: Support reset GPIOs

Hi Maxime,

Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote on Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:06:15
+0100:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:13:25PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > The panel common bindings provide a gpios-reset property which is
> > active low by default. Let's support it in the simple driver.
> >
> > De-asserting the reset pin implies a physical high, which in turns is
> > a logic low.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>  
> 
> The GPIOd API asks for a logical state, so it doesn't really matter
> what the polarity of the GPIO, OUT_LOW will always mean that the reset
> is deasserted (and thus, it will work even if the reset pin is active
> high).
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > index 5d487686d25c..15dd495c347d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct panel_simple {
> >  	struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
> >
> >  	struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
> > +	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> >
> >  	struct drm_display_mode override_mode;
> >  };
> > @@ -433,12 +434,21 @@ static int panel_simple_probe(struct device *dev, const struct panel_desc *desc)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(panel->supply))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(panel->supply);
> >
> > +	panel->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset",
> > +						    GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(panel->reset_gpio)) {
> > +		err = PTR_ERR(panel->reset_gpio);
> > +		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +			dev_err(dev, "failed to request reset pin: %d\n", err);
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +  
> 
> However, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to just have the
> device maintained in reset at probe (so OUT_HIGH) and moved out of
> reset during either the prepare or enable callbacks.
> 
> This is pretty much what is happening with the enable-gpios already.
> 
> Also, panels usually need to wait for a minimum time after you
> deassert the reset line. How is that dealt with?
> 
> I guess a good way to do that would be to add that duration to the
> panel description, since this is pretty much device specific.

What about the case were your Bootloader displays something and you
don't want the panel to blink ?

Right now I am just forcing the reset to be deasserted.

Thanks,
Miquèl