[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191216154356.GE83861@xz-x1>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:56 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Christophe de Dinechin <christophe.de.dinechin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/15] KVM: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:31:50PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> No u64, please. u32 I can agree with, 16-bit *should* be enough but it
> is a bit tight, so let's make it 32-bit if we drop the union idea.
Sure.
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists