[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <926dd55d8d0dc762b1f6461495fc747a@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:36:10 +0800
From: cang@...eaurora.org
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: Modulize ufs-bsg
On 2019-12-16 05:49, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2019-12-11 22:37, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> It's the asymmetry that I don't like.
>>
>> Perhaps if you instead make ufshcd platform_device_register_data() the
>> bsg device you would solve the probe ordering, the remove will be
>> symmetric and module autoloading will work as well (although then you
>> need a MODULE_ALIAS of platform:device-name).
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> From Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/platform.rst:
> "Platform devices are devices that typically appear as autonomous
> entities in the system. This includes legacy port-based devices and
> host bridges to peripheral buses, and most controllers integrated
> into system-on-chip platforms. What they usually have in common
> is direct addressing from a CPU bus. Rarely, a platform_device will
> be connected through a segment of some other kind of bus; but its
> registers will still be directly addressable."
>
> Do you agree that the above description is not a good match for the
> ufs-bsg kernel module?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
I missed this one.
How about making it a plain device and add it from ufs driver?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists