linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] regulator: of: Does always-on imply on-in-suspend?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1576515981-77867-1-git-send-email-r.karszniewicz@phytec.de>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:06:20 +0100
From:   Robert Karszniewicz <r.karszniewicz@...tec.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] regulator: of: Does always-on imply on-in-suspend?

Hi all.

Just to make sure; the oftree property regulator-always-on implies that for
every suspend state, the property regulator-on-in-suspend is implicit? With no
other side-effect? Reading the documentation, this is what I interpret.

So if that is true, the next message is a patch to fix a bogus
"No configuration" warning in the case when regulator-always-on exists and
suspend states are not set explicitly.

Robert Karszniewicz (1):
  regulator: of: Hide wrong warning regarding suspend state
    configuration

 drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.7.4