[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <056501d5b437$91f1c6c0$b5d55440$@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:38:03 -0000
From: "Robert Milkowski" <rmilkowski@...il.com>
To: <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "'Trond Myklebust'" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
"'Anna Schumaker'" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4: nfs4_do_fsinfo() should not do implicit lease renewals
From: Robert Milkowski <rmilkowski@...il.com>
Currently, each time nfs4_do_fsinfo() is called it will do an implicit
NFS4 lease renewal, which is not compliant with the NFS4 specification.
This can result in a lease being expired by NFS server which will then
return NFS4ERR_EXPIRED or NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID.
Signed-off-by: Robert Milkowski <rmilkowski@...il.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 76d3716..aad65dd 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5019,16 +5019,19 @@ static int nfs4_do_fsinfo(struct nfs_server *server,
struct nfs_fh *fhandle, str
struct nfs4_exception exception = {
.interruptible = true,
};
- unsigned long now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long last_renewal = jiffies;
int err;
do {
err = _nfs4_do_fsinfo(server, fhandle, fsinfo);
trace_nfs4_fsinfo(server, fhandle, fsinfo->fattr, err);
if (err == 0) {
+ /* no implicit lease renewal allowed here */
+ if (server->nfs_client->cl_last_renewal != 0)
+ last_renewal =
server->nfs_client->cl_last_renewal;
nfs4_set_lease_period(server->nfs_client,
fsinfo->lease_time * HZ,
- now);
+ last_renewal);
break;
}
err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, err, &exception);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists