[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15afb253-1726-d26a-5e1d-5902d3c88f5d@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:44:51 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: cang@...eaurora.org
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it
On 12/15/19 7:12 PM, cang@...eaurora.org wrote:
> Sure, I will add the Fixes tag and rebase my changes. How about the logic
> part of this change? Does it look good to you?
Hi Can,
You may want to ask someone who is more familiar with the UFS driver
than I to have a look. I'm not a UFS expert ...
> Sorry I was not aware of that your changes have been applied to
> 5.6/scsi-queue.
> I am still trying to get it tested on my setups...
> Anyways, aside of hba->cmd_queue, tearing down hba->tmf_queue before
> scsi_remove_host() may be problem too. Requests can still be
> sent before and during scsi_remove_host(). If a request timed out,
> task abort will be invoked to abort the request, during which
> hba->tmf_queue is expected to be present. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I agree that the code I added in ufshcd_remove() probably needs to be
moved somewhere below the scsi_remove_host() call.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists