[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191217160629.6iwpnd4p6glxbohg@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:06:29 -0600
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtc: checks: check_graph_port: skip node name check in
overlay case
Ping!
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> wrote on Fri [2019-Nov-22 13:16:31 -0600]:
> In check_graph_port() we need to skip the node name check in the overlay
> case as it causes a false positive warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> ---
> checks.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index 756f0fa9203f..6b6712da146a 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -1707,7 +1707,8 @@ static void check_graph_port(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti,
> if (node->bus != &graph_port_bus)
> return;
>
> - if (!strprefixeq(node->name, node->basenamelen, "port"))
> + if (!strprefixeq(node->name, node->basenamelen, "port") &&
> + !(dti->dtsflags & DTSF_PLUGIN))
> FAIL(c, dti, node, "graph port node name should be 'port'");
>
> check_graph_reg(c, dti, node);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists