linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: reserve chip for duration of tpm_tis_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:26:12 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: reserve chip for duration of
 tpm_tis_core_init

On Tue Dec 17 19, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>On Tue Dec 17 19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 18:14 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:00 PM Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon Dec 16 19, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
>>>> > <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> > > On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 16:54 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>>> > > > Instead of repeatedly calling tpm_chip_start/tpm_chip_stop when
>>>> > > > issuing commands to the tpm during initialization, just reserve the
>>>> > > > chip after wait_startup, and release it when we are ready to call
>>>> > > > tpm_chip_register.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Cc: Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>
>>>> > > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>>>> > > > Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
>>>> > > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
>>>> > > > Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> > > > Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
>>>> > > > Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()")
>>>> > > > Fixes: 5b359c7c4372 ("tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's")
>>>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I pushed to my master with minor tweaks and added my tags.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Please check before I put it to linux-next.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't see it yet here:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/master
>>>> >
>>>> > However, I wanted to make sure you captured that this does *not* fix
>>>> > the interrupt issue. I.e. make sure you remove the "Fixes:
>>>> > 5b359c7c4372 ("tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's")"
>>>> > tag.
>>>> >
>>>> > With that said, are you going to include the revert of:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1ea32c83c699 tpm_tis_core: Set TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ before probing for interrupts
>>>>
>>>> Dan, with the above reverted do you still get the screaming interrupt?
>>>
>>>Yes, the screaming interrupt goes away, although it is replaced by
>>>these messages when the driver starts:
>>>
>>>[    3.725131] tpm_tis IFX0740:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1B, rev-id 16)
>>>[    3.725358] tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -5
>>>[    3.725359] tpm tpm0: [Firmware Bug]: TPM interrupt not working,
>>>polling instead
>>>
>>>If the choice is "error message + polled-mode" vs "pinning a cpu with
>>>interrupts" I'd accept the former, but wanted Jarkko with his
>>>maintainer hat to weigh in.
>>>
>>>Is there a simple sanity check I can run to see if the TPM is still
>>>operational in this state?
>>
>>What about T490S?
>>
>>/Jarkko
>>
>
>Hi Jarkko, I'm waiting to hear back from the t490s user, but I imagine
>it still has the problem as well.
>

It appears he is out of the office until January, so I doubt I will hear
anything back until then.

>Christian, were you able to try this patch and verify it still
>resolves the issue you were having with the kernel failing to get the
>timeouts and durations from the tpm?
>
>Thanks,
>Jerry