[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1576543535.462168066@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:46:18 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
syzbot+31c16aa4202dace3812e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"Jakub Kicinski" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
syzbot+6bf095f9becf5efef645@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 044/136] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_sap_state_process()
3.16.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
commit c6ee11c39fcc1fb55130748990a8f199e76263b4 upstream.
syzbot reported:
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888116270800 (size 224):
comm "syz-executor641", pid 7047, jiffies 4294947360 (age 13.860s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 20 e1 2a 81 88 ff ff 00 40 3d 2a 81 88 ff ff . .*.....@......
backtrace:
[<000000004d41b4cc>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] slab_alloc_node mm/slab.c:3269 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x153/0x2a0 mm/slab.c:3579
[<00000000506a5965>] __alloc_skb+0x6e/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:198
[<000000001ba5a161>] alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1058 [inline]
[<000000001ba5a161>] alloc_skb_with_frags+0x5f/0x250 net/core/skbuff.c:5327
[<0000000047d9c78b>] sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x269/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:2225
[<000000003828fe54>] sock_alloc_send_skb+0x32/0x40 net/core/sock.c:2242
[<00000000e34d94f9>] llc_ui_sendmsg+0x10a/0x540 net/llc/af_llc.c:933
[<00000000de2de3fb>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline]
[<00000000de2de3fb>] sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x70 net/socket.c:671
[<000000008fe16e7a>] __sys_sendto+0x148/0x1f0 net/socket.c:1964
[...]
The bug is that llc_sap_state_process() always takes an extra reference
to the skb, but sometimes neither llc_sap_next_state() nor
llc_sap_state_process() itself drops this reference.
Fix it by changing llc_sap_next_state() to never consume a reference to
the skb, rather than sometimes do so and sometimes not. Then remove the
extra skb_get() and kfree_skb() from llc_sap_state_process().
Reported-by: syzbot+6bf095f9becf5efef645@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+31c16aa4202dace3812e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/llc/llc_s_ac.c | 12 +++++++++---
net/llc/llc_sap.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c
@@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_ui(struct llc_sa
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_ui_cmd(skb);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
@@ -81,8 +83,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_xid_c(struct llc
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_xid_cmd(skb, LLC_XID_NULL_CLASS_2, 0);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
@@ -135,8 +139,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_test_c(struct ll
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_test_cmd(skb);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
--- a/net/llc/llc_sap.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_sap.c
@@ -197,29 +197,22 @@ out:
* After executing actions of the event, upper layer will be indicated
* if needed(on receiving an UI frame). sk can be null for the
* datalink_proto case.
+ *
+ * This function always consumes a reference to the skb.
*/
static void llc_sap_state_process(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct llc_sap_state_ev *ev = llc_sap_ev(skb);
- /*
- * We have to hold the skb, because llc_sap_next_state
- * will kfree it in the sending path and we need to
- * look at the skb->cb, where we encode llc_sap_state_ev.
- */
- skb_get(skb);
ev->ind_cfm_flag = 0;
llc_sap_next_state(sap, skb);
- if (ev->ind_cfm_flag == LLC_IND) {
- if (skb->sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
- kfree_skb(skb);
- else {
- llc_save_primitive(skb->sk, skb, ev->prim);
- /* queue skb to the user. */
- if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(skb->sk, skb))
- kfree_skb(skb);
- }
+ if (ev->ind_cfm_flag == LLC_IND && skb->sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
+ llc_save_primitive(skb->sk, skb, ev->prim);
+
+ /* queue skb to the user. */
+ if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(skb->sk, skb) == 0)
+ return;
}
kfree_skb(skb);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists