linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] clk: declare clk_core_reparent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191217194632.DE6FC2146E@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:46:32 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: declare clk_core_reparent_orphans() inline

Quoting Olof Johansson (2019-12-17 10:01:15)
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:25 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Olof Johansson (2019-12-16 20:46:35)
> > > A recent addition exposed a helper that is only used for
> > > CONFIG_OF. Instead of figuring out best place to have it in the order
> > > of various functions, just declare it as explicitly inline, and the
> > > compiler will happily handle it without warning.
> > >
> > > (Also fixup of a single stray empty line while I was looking at the code)
> > >
> > > Fixes: 66d9506440bb ("clk: walk orphan list on clock provider registration")
> > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v3: ACTUALLY amend this time. Sigh. Time to go home.
> > >
> >
> > Isn't it simple enough to just move the function down to CONFIG_OF in
> > drivers/clk/clk.c?
> 
> "Simple" in a 5000 line file is maybe not the right word to use, but
> yeah, sure, do with it what you want.
> 
> Seems like clk.c could do with some refactoring? :)
> 

Ok.