linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3um5paR7DoNE3Qa9pjJx4jDfzsCbh+ihSPf1aGA10Niw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:15:32 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0100,
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> >
> > I hope I addressed all review comments by now, so please pull this
> > for linux-5.6.
> >
> > A git branch with the same contents is available for testing at [1].
> >
> >      Arnd
>
> I see no issue other than the timer API patch Ben pointed.
>
> Could you resubmit that patch?  Or just submit the whole as v8, I
> don't mind either way.  Then we'll get this done for 5.6.

Can you take this as a pull request? That would be ideal for me,
as I can then use it as a parent for a shared branch with additional
cleanups on top (removing time_t etc) in linux-next. It also provides
a nice place to preserve the series cover letter.

I'm sending you the pull request now, and the last modified patch,
in case you prefer the patch over a git tag.

Thanks,

        Arnd