lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191217012508.31495-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:25:08 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: Defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context

The following lockdep splat was observed when a certain hugetlbfs test
was run:

[  612.388273] ================================
[  612.411273] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  612.432273] 4.18.0-159.el8.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G        W --------- -  -
[  612.469273] --------------------------------
[  612.489273] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[  612.517273] swapper/30/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[  612.541273] ffffffff9acdc038 (hugetlb_lock){+.?.}, at: free_huge_page+0x36f/0xaa0
[  612.576273] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[  612.598273]   lock_acquire+0x14f/0x3b0
[  612.616273]   _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[  612.634273]   __nr_hugepages_store_common+0x11b/0xb30
[  612.657273]   hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0x209/0x2d0
[  612.681273]   proc_sys_call_handler+0x37f/0x450
[  612.703273]   vfs_write+0x157/0x460
[  612.719273]   ksys_write+0xb8/0x170
[  612.736273]   do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4d0
[  612.753273]   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf
[  612.777273] irq event stamp: 691296
[  612.794273] hardirqs last  enabled at (691296): [<ffffffff99bb034b>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4b/0x60
[  612.839273] hardirqs last disabled at (691295): [<ffffffff99bb0ad2>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x81
[  612.882273] softirqs last  enabled at (691284): [<ffffffff97ff0c63>] irq_enter+0xc3/0xe0
[  612.922273] softirqs last disabled at (691285): [<ffffffff97ff0ebe>] irq_exit+0x23e/0x2b0
[  612.962273]
[  612.962273] other info that might help us debug this:
[  612.993273]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  612.993273]
[  613.020273]        CPU0
[  613.031273]        ----
[  613.042273]   lock(hugetlb_lock);
[  613.057273]   <Interrupt>
[  613.069273]     lock(hugetlb_lock);
[  613.085273]
[  613.085273]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      :
[  613.245273] Call Trace:
[  613.256273]  <IRQ>
[  613.265273]  dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0
[  613.281273]  mark_lock+0xd0c/0x12f0
[  613.297273]  ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x80/0x80
[  613.322273]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0
[  613.341273]  __lock_acquire+0x146b/0x48c0
[  613.360273]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10
[  613.379273]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x27b/0x580
[  613.401273]  lock_acquire+0x14f/0x3b0
[  613.419273]  ? free_huge_page+0x36f/0xaa0
[  613.440273]  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[  613.458273]  ? free_huge_page+0x36f/0xaa0
[  613.477273]  free_huge_page+0x36f/0xaa0
[  613.495273]  bio_check_pages_dirty+0x2fc/0x5c0
[  613.516273]  clone_endio+0x17f/0x670 [dm_mod]
[  613.536273]  ? disable_discard+0x90/0x90 [dm_mod]
[  613.558273]  ? bio_endio+0x4ba/0x930
[  613.575273]  ? blk_account_io_completion+0x400/0x530
[  613.598273]  blk_update_request+0x276/0xe50
[  613.617273]  scsi_end_request+0x7b/0x6a0
[  613.636273]  ? lock_downgrade+0x6f0/0x6f0
[  613.654273]  scsi_io_completion+0x1c6/0x1570
[  613.674273]  ? sd_completed_bytes+0x3a0/0x3a0 [sd_mod]
[  613.698273]  ? scsi_mq_requeue_cmd+0xc0/0xc0
[  613.718273]  blk_done_softirq+0x22e/0x350
[  613.737273]  ? blk_softirq_cpu_dead+0x230/0x230
[  613.758273]  __do_softirq+0x23d/0xad8
[  613.776273]  irq_exit+0x23e/0x2b0
[  613.792273]  do_IRQ+0x11a/0x200
[  613.806273]  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
[  613.823273]  </IRQ>

Both the hugetbl_lock and the subpool lock can be acquired in
free_huge_page(). One way to solve the problem is to make both locks
irq-safe. Another alternative is to defer the freeing to a workqueue job.

This patch implements the deferred freeing by adding a
free_hpage_workfn() work function to do the actual freeing. The
free_huge_page() call in a non-task context saves the page to be freed
in the hpage_freelist linked list in a lockless manner.

The generic workqueue is used to process the work, but a dedicated
workqueue can be used instead if it is desirable to have the huge page
freed ASAP.

 [v2: Add more comment & remove unneeded racing check]

Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ac65bb5e38ac..1744481bb9a1 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static inline void ClearPageHugeTemporary(struct page *page)
 	page[2].mapping = NULL;
 }
 
-void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
+static void __free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Can't pass hstate in here because it is called from the
@@ -1199,6 +1199,74 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * As free_huge_page() can be called from a non-task context, we have
+ * to defer the actual freeing in a workqueue to prevent potential
+ * hugetlb_lock deadlock.
+ *
+ * free_hpage_workfn() locklessly retrieves the linked list of pages to
+ * be freed and frees them one-by-one. As the page->mapping pointer is
+ * going to be cleared in __free_huge_page() anyway, it is reused as the
+ * next pointer of a singly linked list of huge pages to be freed.
+ */
+#define NEXT_PENDING	((struct page *)-1)
+static struct page *hpage_freelist;
+
+static void free_hpage_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct page *curr, *next;
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	do {
+		curr = xchg(&hpage_freelist, NULL);
+		if (!curr)
+			break;
+
+		while (curr) {
+			next = (struct page *)READ_ONCE(curr->mapping);
+			if (next == NEXT_PENDING) {
+				cpu_relax();
+				continue;
+			}
+			__free_huge_page(curr);
+			curr = next;
+			cnt++;
+		}
+	} while (!READ_ONCE(hpage_freelist));
+
+	if (!cnt)
+		return;
+	pr_debug("HugeTLB: free_hpage_workfn() frees %d huge page(s)\n", cnt);
+}
+static DECLARE_WORK(free_hpage_work, free_hpage_workfn);
+
+void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Defer freeing if in non-task context to avoid hugetlb_lock deadlock.
+	 */
+	if (!in_task()) {
+		struct page *next;
+
+		/*
+		 * Since we cannot atomically update both page->mapping
+		 * and hpage_freelist without lock, a handshake using an
+		 * intermediate NEXT_PENDING value in mapping is used to
+		 * make sure that the reader will see both values correctly.
+		 * The initial write of NEXT_PENDING is before the page
+		 * is visible to a concurrent reader, so WRITE_ONCE()
+		 * isn't needed.
+		 */
+		page->mapping = (struct address_space *)NEXT_PENDING;
+		next = xchg(&hpage_freelist, page);
+		WRITE_ONCE(page->mapping, (struct address_space *)next);
+		schedule_work(&free_hpage_work);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	__free_huge_page(page);
+}
+
 static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid)
 {
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
-- 
2.18.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ