linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:43:42 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     cang@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        nguyenb@...eaurora.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for
 host controller

Hi Can,

On 17-12-19, 08:37, cang@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 03:12, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:05 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Can,
> > > 
> > > On 14-11-19, 22:09, Can Guo wrote:
> > > > Add reset control for host controller so that host controller can be reset
> > > > as required in its power up sequence.
> > > 
> > > I am seeing a regression on UFS on SM8150-mtp with this patch. I think
> > > Jeff is seeing same one lenove laptop on 8998.
> > 
> > Confirmed.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 845 does not seem to have this issue and only thing I can see is
> > > that on
> > > sm8150 and 8998 we define reset as:
> > > 
> > >                         resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_BCR>;
> > >                         reset-names = "rst";
> > > 
> 
> Hi Jeffrey and Vinod,
> 
> Thanks for reporting this. May I know what kind of regression do you see on
> 8150 and 8998?
> BTW, do you have reset control for UFS PHY in your DT?
> See 71278b058a9f8752e51030e363b7a7306938f64e.
> 
> FYI, we use reset control on all of our platforms and it is
> a must during our power up sequence.

Yes we do have this and additionally both the DTS describe a 'rst' reset
and this patch tries to use this.

Can you please tell me which platform this was tested on how the reset
was described in DT

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod