[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191217064009.GB31182@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:40:09 +0100
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: da9062: add driver support
On 19-12-16 11:33, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:47 AM Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Nice catch, Linus is it okay to add this as follow up patch? The current
> > patch isn't wrong without the 'PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE' case.
>
> No strong opinion on that as long as the result is running code.
Of course the code is running and was tested. Just didn't covered this
use case.
Adam is this okay with you?
Regards,
Marco
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists