[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1576543535.970054131@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:47:38 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 124/136] block: drbd: remove a stray unlock in
__drbd_send_protocol()
3.16.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 8e9c523016cf9983b295e4bc659183d1fa6ef8e0 upstream.
There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
this ends up being a double unlock.
Fixes: 44ed167da748 ("drbd: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() for tconn->net_conf")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
@@ -786,7 +786,6 @@ int __drbd_send_protocol(struct drbd_con
if (nc->tentative && connection->agreed_pro_version < 92) {
rcu_read_unlock();
- mutex_unlock(&sock->mutex);
drbd_err(connection, "--dry-run is not supported by peer");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists