[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5df885f8.1c69fb81.13dda.20bb@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 23:38:31 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patrick.rudolph@...ements.com
Cc: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: google: Expose CBMEM over sysfs
Quoting patrick.rudolph@...ements.com (2019-11-28 04:50:50)
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-coreboot b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-coreboot
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1b04b8abc858
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-coreboot
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +What: /sys/bus/coreboot/devices/.../cbmem_attributes/id
> +Date: Nov 2019
> +KernelVersion: 5.5
> +Contact: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> +Description:
> + coreboot device directory can contain a file named
> + cbmem_attributes/id if the device corresponds to a CBMEM
> + buffer.
> + The file holds an ASCII representation of the CBMEM ID in hex
> + (e.g. 0xdeadbeef).
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/coreboot/devices/.../cbmem_attributes/size
> +Date: Nov 2019
> +KernelVersion: 5.5
> +Contact: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> +Description:
> + coreboot device directory can contain a file named
> + cbmem_attributes/size if the device corresponds to a CBMEM
> + buffer.
> + The file holds an representation as decimal number of the
> + CBMEM buffer size (e.g. 64).
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/coreboot/devices/.../cbmem_attributes/address
> +Date: Nov 2019
> +KernelVersion: 5.5
> +Contact: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> +Description:
> + coreboot device directory can contain a file named
> + cbmem_attributes/address if the device corresponds to a CBMEM
> + buffer.
> + The file holds an ASCII representation of the physical address
> + of the CBMEM buffer in hex (e.g. 0x000000008000d000).
What is the purpose of this field? Can't userspace read the 'data'
attribute to get the data out?
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/coreboot/devices/.../cbmem_attributes/data
> +Date: Nov 2019
> +KernelVersion: 5.5
> +Contact: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> +Description:
> + coreboot device directory can contain a file named
> + cbmem_attributes/data if the device corresponds to a CBMEM
> + buffer.
> + The file holds a read-only binary representation of the CBMEM
> + buffer.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/cbmem-coreboot.c b/drivers/firmware/google/cbmem-coreboot.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c67651a9c287
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/cbmem-coreboot.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * fmap-coreboot.c
> + *
> + * Exports CBMEM as attributes in sysfs.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2012-2013 David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
> + * Copyright 2017 Google Inc.
> + * Copyright 2019 9elements Agency GmbH
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
Is this include used? Should probably include linux/memremap.h instead.
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "coreboot_table.h"
> +
> +#define CB_TAG_CBMEM_ENTRY 0x31
> +
> +struct cb_priv {
> + void *remap;
> + struct lb_cbmem_entry entry;
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t id_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buffer)
> +{
> + const struct cb_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = (const struct cb_priv *)dev_get_platdata(dev);
Please drop useless casts from void *.
> +
> + return sprintf(buffer, "0x%08x\n", priv->entry.id);
Use %#08x. Also not sure we need newlines but I guess it's OK.
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t size_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buffer)
> +{
> + const struct cb_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = (const struct cb_priv *)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + return sprintf(buffer, "%u\n", priv->entry.size);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t address_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buffer)
> +{
> + const struct cb_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = (const struct cb_priv *)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + return sprintf(buffer, "0x%016llx\n", priv->entry.address);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(id);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(size);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(address);
> +
> +static struct attribute *cb_mem_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_address.attr,
> + &dev_attr_id.attr,
> + &dev_attr_size.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t data_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> + char *buffer, loff_t offset, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> + const struct cb_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = (const struct cb_priv *)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + return memory_read_from_buffer(buffer, count, &offset,
> + priv->remap, priv->entry.size);
> +}
> +
> +static BIN_ATTR_RO(data, 0);
> +
> +static struct bin_attribute *cb_mem_bin_attrs[] = {
> + &bin_attr_data,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group cb_mem_attr_group = {
Can it be const?
> + .name = "cbmem_attributes",
> + .attrs = cb_mem_attrs,
> + .bin_attrs = cb_mem_bin_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static int cbmem_probe(struct coreboot_device *cdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &cdev->dev;
> + struct cb_priv *priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(&priv->entry, &cdev->cbmem_entry, sizeof(priv->entry));
> +
> + priv->remap = memremap(priv->entry.address,
> + priv->entry.entry_size, MEMREMAP_WB);
> + if (!priv->remap) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto failure;
> + }
> +
> + err = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &cb_mem_attr_group);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create sysfs attributes: %d\n", err);
> + memunmap(priv->remap);
> + goto failure;
> + }
> +
> + dev->platform_data = priv;
Can we use dev_{set,get}_drvdata() instead?
> +
> + return 0;
> +failure:
> + kfree(priv);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int cbmem_remove(struct coreboot_device *cdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &cdev->dev;
> + const struct cb_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = (const struct cb_priv *)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &cb_mem_attr_group);
> +
> + if (priv)
> + memunmap(priv->remap);
> + kfree(priv);
> +
> + dev->platform_data = NULL;
This shouldn't be necessary if the driver_data APIs are used instead.
The driver core does it for us then.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct coreboot_driver cbmem_driver = {
> + .probe = cbmem_probe,
> + .remove = cbmem_remove,
> + .drv = {
> + .name = "cbmem",
> + },
> + .tag = CB_TAG_CBMEM_ENTRY,
> +};
> +
> +module_coreboot_driver(cbmem_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("9elements Agency GmbH");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.h b/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.h
> index 7b7b4a6eedda..506048c724d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.h
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ struct lb_framebuffer {
> u8 reserved_mask_size;
> };
>
> +/* There can be more than one of these records as there is one per cbmem entry.
Please add a bare /* for multi-line comments.
> + * Describes a buffer in memory containing runtime data.
> + */
> +struct lb_cbmem_entry {
> + u32 tag;
> + u32 size;
> +
> + u64 address;
> + u32 entry_size;
> + u32 id;
> +};
> +
> /* A device, additionally with information from coreboot. */
> struct coreboot_device {
> struct device dev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists